Student-Generated Tests and Their Impact on EFL Students' Learning of Grammar / Öğrencilerin Ürettiği Testler ve Onların Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğrenen Öğrencilerin Dilbilgisi Öğrenimi Üzerindeki Etkisi
Tam metin:PDF (English)
Angelo, T. A., & Cross, P. A. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ashtiani, N. S., & Babaii, E. (2007). Cooperative test construction: The last temptation Educational reform? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 213,2
Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Brink, J., Capps, E., & Sutko, A. (2004). Student exam creation as a learning tool. College Student Journal, 38, 262-272.
Bobak, K. A. (2008). Use of student-generated test questions as a classroom assessment technique within the chiropractic technique classroom. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 22, 49-50.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practice. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 653- 675.
Brown, L. W. (1991). To learn is to teach is to create the final exam. College Teaching, 39, 150-153.
Enerson, D. M., Plank, K. M., & Johnson, R. N. (2007). An introduction to Classroom Techniques. Retrieved 20, 3, 2010, from http:// www. Schreyerinstitute.edu/.
Frase, L.T., & Schwartz, B.J. (1975). Effect of question production and answering on Prose recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 6286
Harmer, J. (1987). Teaching and learning grammar. London: Longman.
Haugen, L. (1999). Classroom assessment techniques. Retrieved 3, 9, 2009, from http:// www.Celt.iastste.edu/teaching/cat.html .
Klenowski, V. (2009). Editorial: Assessment for learning revisited: An AsiaPacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 16, 263–268.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 537-560.
Lam, R. (2014). Can student-generated test materials support learning?. Studies in Educational Evaluation (in press). Retrieved 30, 5, 2014 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X1400008X . Lee, I. (2007). Assessment for learning: Integrating assessment, teaching, and learning in the ESL/EFL writing classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 199-214.
Leung, C., & Mohen, B. (2004). Teacher Formative Assessment and Talk in Classroom Contexts: Assessment as Discourse and Assessment of Discourse. Language Testing, 21, 335-359.
Morris, T. (2004). CAT characteristics. Retrieved 23, 9, 2009, from http:// IAR Assess Teaching.html.
Murphey, T. (1995). Tests: Learning Through Negotiated Interaction. TESOL Journal, 4, 12-16.
Pearson, J.A. (1991). Testing the ecological validity of teacher-provided versus student-generated postquestions in reading college science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 485-504.
Rash, A. M. (1997). An alternative method of assessment: using studentcreated problems. PRIMUS, 7, 89-95.
Stiggins, R. (2004). New assessment beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 22- 27.
Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2005). Using student-involved classroom assessment to close achievement gaps. Theory and Practice, 44, 11- 18. William, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation. 37, 3-14.
Wongsri, N., Cantwell, R. H., & Archer, J. (2002). The validation of measures of self-efficacy, motivation, and self-regulated learning among Thai tertiary students. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane. Retrieved November, 2009, from: http://www.aare.edu.au/02pup/won02088.htm.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.