Student-Generated Tests and Their Impact on EFL Students' Learning of Grammar / Öğrencilerin Ürettiği Testler ve Onların Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Öğrenen Öğrencilerin Dilbilgisi Öğrenimi Üzerindeki Etkisi

Sasan BALEGHIZADEH, Zahra ZARGHAMI
2.267 838

Öz


Bu çalışma, İngilizce’yi yabancı dil olarak öğrenen öğrencilerin ürettikleri testlerin onların dilbilgisi öğrenimlerine etkisi hakkında bir araştırmayı rapor etmektedir. Bu bağlamda, orta düzeydeki 68 İranlı üniversite öğrencisi deney ve control gruplarına yerleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda deney grubundaki öğrenciler kontrol grubundakilerden anlamlı derecede daha iyi bir performans sergilemişlerdir. Bu da test hazırlamanın öğrencilerin dilbilgisi öğrenimleri üzerinde olumlu bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar kelimeler


öğrencilerin ürettiği testler, alternatif değerlendirmeler, sınıf-içi değerlendirme teknikleri

Tam metin:

PDF (English)


Referanslar


Angelo, T. A., & Cross, P. A. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ashtiani, N. S., & Babaii, E. (2007). Cooperative test construction: The last temptation Educational reform? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 213,2

Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Brink, J., Capps, E., & Sutko, A. (2004). Student exam creation as a learning tool. College Student Journal, 38, 262-272.

Bobak, K. A. (2008). Use of student-generated test questions as a classroom assessment technique within the chiropractic technique classroom. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 22, 49-50.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practice. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 653- 675.

Brown, L. W. (1991). To learn is to teach is to create the final exam. College Teaching, 39, 150-153.

Enerson, D. M., Plank, K. M., & Johnson, R. N. (2007). An introduction to Classroom Techniques. Retrieved 20, 3, 2010, from http:// www. Schreyerinstitute.edu/.

Frase, L.T., & Schwartz, B.J. (1975). Effect of question production and answering on Prose recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 6286

Harmer, J. (1987). Teaching and learning grammar. London: Longman.

Haugen, L. (1999). Classroom assessment techniques. Retrieved 3, 9, 2009, from http:// www.Celt.iastste.edu/teaching/cat.html .

Klenowski, V. (2009). Editorial: Assessment for learning revisited: An AsiaPacific perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 16, 263–268.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 537-560.

Lam, R. (2014). Can student-generated test materials support learning?. Studies in Educational Evaluation (in press). Retrieved 30, 5, 2014 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X1400008X . Lee, I. (2007). Assessment for learning: Integrating assessment, teaching, and learning in the ESL/EFL writing classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 199-214.

Leung, C., & Mohen, B. (2004). Teacher Formative Assessment and Talk in Classroom Contexts: Assessment as Discourse and Assessment of Discourse. Language Testing, 21, 335-359.

Morris, T. (2004). CAT characteristics. Retrieved 23, 9, 2009, from http:// IAR Assess Teaching.html.

Murphey, T. (1995). Tests: Learning Through Negotiated Interaction. TESOL Journal, 4, 12-16.

Pearson, J.A. (1991). Testing the ecological validity of teacher-provided versus student-generated postquestions in reading college science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 485-504.

Rash, A. M. (1997). An alternative method of assessment: using studentcreated problems. PRIMUS, 7, 89-95.

Stiggins, R. (2004). New assessment beliefs for a new school mission. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 22- 27.

Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2005). Using student-involved classroom assessment to close achievement gaps. Theory and Practice, 44, 11- 18. William, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation. 37, 3-14.

Wongsri, N., Cantwell, R. H., & Archer, J. (2002). The validation of measures of self-efficacy, motivation, and self-regulated learning among Thai tertiary students. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane. Retrieved November, 2009, from: http://www.aare.edu.au/02pup/won02088.htm.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.